Socialists Lies and propaganda.

What socialists do the most of is lying. The reason for their vast number of falsehoods, is that they are determined to force their will on to the public, but if they explained what their intentions were, almost everyone would oppose them. Socialists have turned deception into an art form, and even when caught out are able to ride it out with ease. The psychology works like this. Normally, someone caught cheating or lying goes red with embarrassment, and either apologises or makes an excuse for his bad behaviour. However, the well-trained socialist wrongdoer remains calm and insists that he has done nothing wrong. Because he acts in an innocent manner, his would-be critics think he is not acting in a way we would expect if he were guilty, so perhaps we have misjudged him and he is innocent, and so the matter is set aside. Bill Clinton is a master of deception who passed the tricks of the trade on to Tony Blair. The American comedian, Jackie Mason, told a joke based on how Bill Clinton got away with the Monica Lewinsky affair. The joke goes something like this. A wife comes in and finds her husband seated with his trousers round his ankles and his young secretary on her knees in front of him. "My God what is going on?" asks the wife." "Don't get excited," says the husband. "This isn't sex, the President says so."

Here is another joke about lying socialists that was told many times about Harold Wilson. When Harold Wilson is filling his pipe he is telling the truth. When he is smoking his pipe he is telling the truth, it is only when he is talking that he is lying.

Gordon Brown's insistence that the EU constitution that he wants to accept is not the one that has already been rejected, is on a par with the Monty Python "dead parrot" sketch. Everyone knows that the constitution that Brown wants to accept, is the same one that has already been rejected by the French and Dutch; even top EU officials admit it, but Brown doggedly refuses to accept the obvious, in just the same way that the shopkeeper refused to accept the parrot was dead, when it clearly was. "It's not dead it's resting," claimed the shopkeeper in a pathetic attempt to ignore the obvious. It's not the same constitution, there is a word or two different, claims Gordon Brown, in precisely the same manner. Are we really going to allow Gordon Brown, this anti-British dogmatic, twister-of-the-truth to continue being Prime Minister? We would be damned fools if we did!

Gordon Brown always knew that an essential condition of becoming Prime Minister was to be enthusiastically pro-EU. Whichever party forms the government will be so. To give the impression to the public that there is serious opposition to the EU in Parliament, while not being in a position to press ahead with EU agenda, Ministers can appear to be Euro-sceptics, but once their job entails work on the European programme they must become Euro-fanatics. So we have seen over the years Labour and Conservatives take it in turn to be Euro sceptic. While in power they are solidly pro-EU, but when in opposition they voice the concerns of those who want out.

Margaret Thatcher, on becoming Prime Minister, at first did as she was told and embraced the EU, even signing the "Single European Act". When she later changed her attitude and became anti-EU, claiming that "Britain must not lose its sovereignty to Europe," the Bilderbergers who had placed her in office had her removed. The bumbling John Major was put in as a stop-gap replacement. He was informed that he had only been put there for one prime purpose, and that was to sign the "Maastricht Treaty," which he did.

Socialists for a good many years have had the advantage of holding sway over the mass media; through television, newspapers, films magazines and scriptwriting. For a long time they have been able to get away with the most diabolical lies, particularly when talking about British patriots. The National Union of Journalists, a communist-led body brought in a rule back in the 1970s that they would only mention the National Front if the report could be slanted to give a bad impression. Deliberate acts of deception were carried out, once a coach load of rowdy football hooligans was filmed disembarking, and reporters claimed it was a coach carrying National Front members. It was of course nothing of the kind, but the majority of the public wouldn't know any different, so our image was unfairly tarnished. Things have since changed. Now we have the internet and can make contact directly with the public. As this is the National Front's fortieth year, we would like to present to you some of our members from over the years, people who have been wrongly described by the media as knuckle dragging thugs, troublesome skinheads and social lepers.

We have omitted details of some members as they either work in the public sector, or in close association and letting it be known they are British patriots could get them the sack. Think on this. Why does the British government refuse to employ decent law-abiding British citizens who care about the country, yet is eager to give jobs to foreigners with criminal records, aliens who cannot speak English and Muslims who associate with terrorist cells?