The most terrible thing that can affect any nation, worse than earthquakes, whirlwinds, tsunamis, plagues, pestilence, crop failure, drought, volcanic eruptions, fire, flood, or all of them together - that most terrible of all things is "socialism". For its effects are more permanent, more destructive and incredibly far-reaching.  Nations can recover from natural calamities.  However, if left unchecked, socialism, an invention of bankers and moneylenders,  will threaten the very existence of every nation that succumbs to its evil.

Parliament make the absurd claim that they cannot act in the national interest whenever confronted by "Human Rights"        legislators. One should not be taken in by this, for our devious government has deliberately placed itself in that position. Similarly, the drug culture that is having a devastating effect on British youth has arisen because Parliament has given a green light to drug abusers, as anyone trying to get police assistance to stop drug-dealing will know. Immigrants have brought with them a whole range of new crimes, including mugging and "steaming", also the knife and gun culture which now inflicts terror on many of our towns and cities.  Thousands of foreigners, from every land, enter our country every day, not because Parliament has in any way lost control as it would have us believe, but due to "the open door policy" which socialists and communists have always advocated.

 

The "open door policy" has allowed an endless stream of people to enter our country unchecked. Many have come from Asia suffering from TB, including a new life-threatening strain that is resistant to drugs. Anti-racist laws are used to deny our people a  chance of avoiding these infected people. You are likely to find Asians with TB working in factories where food is prepared, or sitting beside you in a bus or train. You can be pretty sure that our children are constantly coming into contact with many who haveTB while at school. Despite public anxiety over the problem, Parliament turns a deaf ear.  A large percentage of Africans have AIDS, a disease so contagious that it threatens to wipe out three quarters of the African population. Does the government move to protect our people from that terminal disease that is so easily spread by sexual intercourse?   No.   On the contrary, the whole left-wing movement encourages our girls to have sexual relationships with blacks, who are nearly always portrayed by media moguls as more exciting and vibrant than whites. Having recognised that our birth rate can be dramatically reduced by turning vast numbers of our children into lesbians and homosexuals, they have deliberately used it as a way to reduce our white population.  Who do we see in the vanguard of "Gay Parades" promoting it?    Communists, including Ken Livingstone, George Galloway, the Anti-Nazi League and UNISON, the red trade union.   Isn't that a surprise!

 

It is not only the young whose lives have been put in peril by socialists, hardly a day goes by without reports of elderly Britons dying in care homes where mainly foreign staff have either through neglect or malpractice watched them die. No action has ever been taken by Parliament to improve the situation.  If you were to gather any ten people from a bus stop and put them in charge of the country you can be pretty sure that, motivated by the frightening number of deaths occurring in our hospitals, the first thing they would tackle is the filthy wards in these institutions. So, ask yourself why hasn't our socialist government lifted a finger to remedy the situation?

 

Then we come to our young men and women in the forces who without proper equipment are fighting wars in countries where we have no right to be.  Parliament keeps quiet about the number of casualties and fatalities that have occurred. One woman who dared carry out a roll call of the fallen beside the Cenotaph in London was arrested by more than twelve police officers and threatened under the Prevention of Terrorism Act, the same act by means of which Walter Wolfgang was evicted from the Labour Party conference when he made a remark doubting the desirability of the assault on Iraq.   Parliament would not like to be reminded that the purpose of maintaining our armed forces is to defend our borders.   No doubt the Prevention of Terrorism Act would be used to silence anyone who pointed this out.      

 

Education has been in the control of communists since the early 1960s. The level of education in our schools is abysmal, and steadily getting worse.   Recent reports show that many foreigners in Britain for whom English is a second language have a far better grasp of the English language, including punctuation, than do our own younger generation. It is not that our schools and colleges cannot once more become institutions of excellence. Those in charge of our education have deliberately created a system which fails our children. They have done this to ensure that the majority of British children will be incapable of taking on demanding jobs, i.e. those positions which have power or influence attached to them. These posts are to be filled mainly by foreigners and communists. Anyone who has any doubts only needs to study the situation.

 

"What is the purpose of this left-wing insanity?", you may ask?   It is everthing to do with the bankers' desire to control all people and take for themselves the assets of every nation.  Any intelligent and well organised state would move against them to prevent such a takeover. That is why anti-nationalist organisations are doing their utmost to turn once great civilised nations into inefficient, third world countries.

 

Still not convinced? Then perhaps you could give another reason why Parliament is closing so many hospitals, schools and police stations, or allowing thousands of violent criminals, including murderers, to roam our streets rather than lock them up in jail.  After making enemies of Muslims, why do you think so many have they been encouraged to come and set up camp within our towns and cities?  Some immigrant communities, made brave by the backing they receive from Parliament, have dared to declare that the region they have settled in to be a no-go area for whites.                                                                                   New Labour has politicised the police force to a degree where it is often incapable or unwilling to carry out duties for which it is was set up.  We also have an unacceptable situation where, time after time, illegal immigrants have been found occupying positions in the Home Office, where they have been given the job of deciding which fellow illegal immigrants should be allowed to remain in the UK. 

 

Within living memory Britain ruled over the largest Empire ever. We had a skilled workforce that was able to administer to the needs of every one of our colonies.  Great feats of engineering were carried out at the time on projects such as  building railways in some of the world's most inhospitable places. ( Many of which are still in service today.)  Britain had been the workshop of the world, producing locomotives, ships, aircraft, cars, lorries and all kinds of other manufactured goods for countries all over the world.  Yet today, we seem to have an administration and workforce, often unable or unwilling to cope with even the most basic tasks such as ensuring that railway lines are in good order or hospital wards are kept clean. 

 

There was a time, or at least we like to believe there was, when men held positions of power because they cared about the people, or had the necessary knowledge and skills to rule wisely and effectively. Today the only thing that decides who rules is money or membership of the right group.  All senior posts in Britain and many other countries are held exclusively by people who are either Masons, Fabians, Bilderbergers, Zionists or Communists.  Furthermore, most Britons are prevented from gaining even a modicum of political influence by way of poor education.  As a result they will not even be given a platform to speak publicly, no matter how wise their observations, or brilliant their ideas.  People like  judges, bishops, surgeons, inventors or scientists will sometimes be asked for their opinions, while gardeners, milkmen, train drivers and postmen never will.  So much for the idea that we live in a democracy. 

 

                                        SOCIALISM FROM ANOTHER VIEWPOINT

Most socialists have been through college and university, and many come from wealthy backgrounds. While studying many take "Sociology" as an option. This is the starting point for a young socialist as he or she is introduced to the ideas of Karl Marx, Freud and other charlatans.   extreme left-wing ideas are generally anti-Christian, anti-family, anti-marriage and anti-democracy.   Socialists believe that by adapting to the ideas of Marxism they are somehow being different and individual.   In reality, Marxism preaches complete control over the individual, and that all human beings should be equal in wealth and in every other way, so in reality there is no individualism.  It allows for no God or religion.  For example, when communism took hold of the Balkans after 1945 all mosques and churches were shut down, and religion was forbidden.  The serious crime of "individualism" in a socialist environment is punishable by death. 

 

It could be argued that Socialists in Britain are "fake".   Many are nothing more than "Hippies" who partake of drugs and engage in perverse behaviour. They seek to smash what they call "fascism", meaning anyone who takes a pride in his or her own culture. Socialists, of course, do not.    That is why they support a one-world ideology without borders,  rules, individual cultures or even any form of self-imposed discipline. One can easily get the impression from  socialists demanding change, that they want to remove all forms of rules and disciplines.  This is not the case, they want to bring an end to traditional ways, methods and values in order they may impose their own.  Few who advocate Socialism are prepared to face up to the fact that their chosen means of government inevitably  leads to tyranny and mass killings.  A Communist is quite different from an anarchist.  The latter believes that if a government becomes too authoritarian, in an unpopular way, then some form of organised disobedience should be used to force change or bring it down.

 

 Under socialism human beings, apart from those holding party positions, are all considered the same.   That is why race-mixing ideology is part of socialism, as is the belief that there are no racial differences, and that therefore there is no difference between a Negro, a Chinaman, or a white European with light features.   This, of course, is total nonsense, but under a socialist government, if it carried out its policies, all races and cultures would be forced to mix into a melting pot and come out  in a hybrid form.  The people who have created the socialist ideology have been individuals who were hell-bent on destroying nations and creating a one-world state, with human beings living as slaves in near-poverty.   The nearest we have to this kind of scenario is found in Latin America, although virtually every nation has suffered the effects of Socialism since its commercialisation in the early 1960s.