The media has come full circle and is now a big ugly lie machine that has lost sight of reality and lives largely in a world of its own making, functioning to mount attacks and smear campaigns against its own enemies or to promote its own favourite causes and personalities.

There is a tendency to trot out platitudes as though they were established fact and to describe certain people as though the description was the determining factor and not the actual appearance or nature of the people described. What you see and hear is true, without question and without argument.

Whenever a protest is launched about immigration or asylum seekers the media goes into overdrive, churning out the same garbage and using the same platitudes. The public buys the paper, does the crossword, looks at page three and then puts the newspaper under the cat’s dish. Millions of TV viewers stare in utter boredom at the news, waiting for their favourite soap or sports event. In truth, the media is no longer actually reaching the public, the public is bypassing the media to get to what’s left of real life.

So the media has achieved a second objective and moved into the sacred precincts of the artist’s prerogative to demand that script writers, talk show hosts, actors, fiction writers, poets and musicians all conform to the prevailing view, or no contracts, no books published and no slots on prime time. It’s a disgrace and everyone hates the situation, but no one makes any moves to do anything about it. The media has become a kind of nasty big bug in our lives that no one knows how to exterminate

The antidote is simple and devastatingly effective. Switch off the TV, don’t go to movies that portray things you don’t approve of, don’t eat junk food and don’t buy newspapers. Don’t buy products advertised on programmes that you dislike. There is life beyond the media. News, entertainment and happiness is possible if we look for it elsewhere. It’s a question of breaking the habit of listening to a service that no longer actually provides a service, but rather creates stress, anger and frustration in us every time we switch on or turn a page. The activist’s campaign of the year must be to kick the media out of our lives. It’s legal, it’s good for you and it’s very satisfying.

The latest format with regard to nationalism is a collection of words like “hate”, “hater”, “nazi” and “fascist” associated with terms like “whip up hatred” and “cause divisions among people”. These are balanced with words like “peace”, “peaceful”, “multicultural” and “diversity” associated with terms like “they’re not wanted” and “we’ve never had any trouble before.”

No matter what the real situation involves, no matter how much genuine concern people may have with respect to a particular event or issue, these words will be trotted out obediently and used to describe anything from rioting to peaceful protest. The media message is always clear -  “indigenous people who are concerned about their future are nasty racists and non indigenous people are all saints.” Thus is it written in the great book of media wisdom: “Thou shalt not criticize the non-white. Thou shalt instead lay the blame for every planetary ill squarely upon the heads of white people, no matter what the circumstances. Whites are bastards and are always wrong.” And if you want to keep your job in the media you will play this particular game or you will be told to leave. Anyone who appears to be taking the long view is merely being placed in this position to make the public think that the media practices what it preaches about diversity and truth. But it doesn’t. If it did it would risk allowing foreign elements into its territory. Every single face on that screen and journalist in that paper or magazine is bought and paid for, is a whore of the system and cannot escape. Every writer is under contract, every filmmaker runs the risk of losing his or her head if they step out of line. “Alternative” broadcasting and film making is a risky business, makes no money and is often short-lived. The big media machine has the government’s approval and this is why when governments change, so does the nature of broadcasting, publishing and film making. That’s why rich controllers like to buy their politicians at the politically correct supermarket and the only real competition at voting time is between groups of controllers not the general public. The general public is there to swallow their spin.

When a small village in the middle of nowhere holds a protest meeting to highlight genuine concerns about huge numbers of foreign immigrants being placed in their midst, the media produces a report peppered with the words “hate”, “nazi” and “division”. You don’t need to buy the paper to know what the report will look like. “The National Front (or the BNP, or anyone else who is white) have only come here to whip up hatred between people. We don’t want them here. We get on very well with everyone. We are multicultural. We’re only complaining about the strain on services” … etc.

It’s the same old story every single time. You’d think they’d realise that people would notice, but they just go on pushing the same old buttons and using the same terms until their reports start to look like formulae with a few new words stuck into the storyline to indicate place names and dates.

The truth is that white Britons (or whites anywhere else) are not allowed to complain about anything unless it’s also the concern of non-whites. Then it’s fine. If it’s about things and issues that affect whites in their own homelands then its labelled not as protest but as “hate”. In truth, it is the media that hates. The media hates whites and white issues. The media hates all things that struggle against oppression by multicultural forces.  The media has no sympathy whatsoever for anyone with European ancestry. If you’re white, you are a bastard and if you happen to like being white then you are lower than scum.

Children are being brainwashed by the media into hating their own kind – but only if they’re white. Non-white children are being told that if you’re not white you are perfect and incapable of sin. You can go round kicking whites in the pants, accusing them of racism and hatred, taking their countries, their living space, their technology and their money and still you will be the apple of daddy’s eye because you are non-white and non-whites are victims and martyrs and saints. The situation is reaching crisis point and the media shares a large amount of the blame with politicians and educational officials.

Very soon whites will have been silenced altogether and will stand by and watch their heritage and their biological reality go down the drain. They will be the terrible silent witnesses of their own genocide by forces in the state and in the media. The big questions for surviving generations of humans, no matter what their ethnicity, will be “Why did they allow this to happen to them? Why didn’t they fight back? Couldn’t they see what was happening?” And most importantly. “Is there a lesson in this for us?” The answer will lie in the powerful hands of the media and the art of psychological manipulation and mass hypnosis. And the lesson for surviving generations will be “Be careful that this does not also happen to you.”

Fear is the factor that drives people to keep quiet and to tolerate the intolerable. Fear of what the neighbours will say, fear of losing jobs and bank loans, fear of prison and the law, fear of punishment ,of social shunning. Fear of being thought of as a “bad person”.

This fear is very real. It’s not a question of cowardice, it’s more a question of ethics. People all over the world are basically good-hearted. It is a scientifically established fact that psychopaths make up only 3-6 % of any population yet cause up to 80% of the world’s misery. So all any system needs is a few anti-social factors in its controlling mechanism and vast numbers of people will be rendered unhappy. You only have to look at dictatorships to prove this point.

Britain is presently in the grip of a fascist dictatorship and although everyone knows this and many people mutter it under their breath, the powerful state machine has its electronic eye on every citizen and so operates now not from democracy, a system it pretends to uphold and practise, but from pure autocratic whim, a thing it attributes instead to small nationalist movements that dare to spring up in defence of the indigenous people and the racial experiment that has gone horribly wrong and that will most certainly wipe the British people as they have been known for centuries from the face of the earth.

In view of these factors, the least anyone could do to put a spanner in the works would be to refuse to listen to the media, refuse to buy certain products, watch certain sporting events or patronise certain outlets and to vote for parties that support the interests of indigenous people. Invasion is happening bloodlessly, let response to invasion do the same. Let the activism of millions be a quiet refusal to play the game. If the government cannot be changed by democratic means, the government will learn to its own consternation the alternative to that which it so blithely endorses but never practises. First the civilized protest. If the ears remain deaf and the eyes remain blind, then what was prophesied many years ago will come to pass and the world will witness once again the will of the British people to keep their island home free.