No Tar, to drugs.
Northern Ireland show how to deal with drug dealers.
|
No Tar, to drugs.
|
|
Residents of South Belfast have become so incensed with the lack of interest their police force shows in cracking down on drug-dealers that some of them decided that direct action was their only alternative. After a regular drug-dealer was caught selling once again, a group of South Belfast residents took it upon themselves to dish out some good old fashioned justice which would deter the miscreant from re-offending.
They bound the drug-dealer to a lamp post and tied a placard round his neck informing all passers by that he is " A Drug Dealing Scumbag" The group then proceeded to tar and feather him in the old traditional way. (Tarring and feathering caused miscreants social embarrassment. Like the stocks, the practice successfully acted as a deterrent against anti-social behaviour without physically harming the individual.)
|
|
First. his head is covered in warm tar. Then feathers are scattered over the tar.. |
|
|
The finished product.
Its "no Tar", to drugs
The drug dealer has to face humiliation and scorn from his neighbours.
Margaret Ritchie, Northern Ireland's social development minister said " This kind of behaviour has no place in a civilised society." Ms Ritchie has got it quite wrong. The kind of behaviour which is not acceptable in a civilised society is that of Parliament, who refuse to act over an escalating drug problem that they introduced.
|
NF comment:
This type of justice, quickly deters drug dealers, and protects communities.
The drug dealer, was not physically harmed by the process. Just a learnt a
valuable lesson - Not to sell drugs to our children. The next day,
he will be a bit wiser. When police and parliament, refuse to
protect us against drug dealers, then what are we supposed to do to protect our
children.?
An interesting story, is also the US judge, who sentenced three men who were caught soliciting for sex to wear a chicken suite for the afternoon,
He ordered three men who were busted in a sex sting to put on chicken costumes. The men took turns wearing a bright yellow, feathered chicken costume outside the courthouse with a sign saying "No Chicken Ranch in Painesville."
Typically, when the BBC
reported this, they left out half the facts, What the BBC failed to
mention is that the US judge gave the men an option of 1 month in jail, OR wear
a chicken suite for an afternoon outside the court house. The men chose to
wear the chicken suite, preferring one afternoon of humiliation to one
month in jail.
The interesting fact, is the biased reporting by the BBC, they want to
make out that the judge was some unreasonable right wing wacko, so they
left out half the facts. They didn't tell you that he gave the defendants a
choice as to their punishment. By leaving out half the facts, the
BBC is often able to skew any story, to fit their own political agenda.
See BBC report (with half the facts left out)
